Composite
resistant to salt and frost
resistant to salt and frost
Composite is resistant to salt and frost, and can be very advantageous compared to concrete and steel. The weight is of the essence. A composite bridge has a weight that is 40% lower than steel, and 30% lower than concrete.
The environmental benefits are also optimal. In a study, in which the accumulated energy level and C02 footprint of different types of bridges are compared, the results show that composite materials have greater environmental benefits compared to steel and concrete:
Material choice: | The accumulated energy content: (Prod. of raw materials, prod. process, transport, disassembly and recirculation) | CO2 footprints: (Total content of GHG through the lifecycle) |
---|---|---|
Steel bridge | 3380 GJ | 178 tons CO2 |
Composite bridge w/ carbon fiber | 2210 GJ | 108 tons CO2 |
Concrete bridge | 1978 GJ | 145 tons CO2 |
Composite bridge w/glassfiber | 652 GJ | 75 tons CO2 |